State v. Collins
Citations
- 69 Wash. 268
- 124 P. 903
- 1912 Wash. LEXIS 889
Syllabus
<p>Elections—Offenses—Fraudulent Registration—False Oath— Loss of “Civil Rights.” The registration oath, required by Rem. & Bal. Code, § 4768, that the elector had not lost his civil rights by having been convicted of an infamous crime, is not shown to be false by an allegation in an information for false swearing that the accused had taken the oath after conviction of a felony, where, by such conviction, he had lost no civil rights, but only the right to vote, which is a political and not a civil right.</p> <p>Same—Statutes Construed. Const., art. 6, § 3, providing that persons convicted of infamous crimes shall be excluded from the elective franchise unless restored to their civil rights, cannot be taken as a construction of the existing territorial statute (Rem. & Bal. Code, § 4755), to mean that such persons lost their civil rights, When the act only forfeited their right to vote, a political and not a civil right.</p> <p>Same—Infamous Charge—Jail Breaking. An information for falsely swearing, in a registration oath made pursuant to Rem. & Bal. Code, § 4768, that the accused had not lost his civil rights, by being convicted of an infamous crime, is insufficient where it merely alleges that the accused had been convicted of the infamous crime of jail breaking in another state without showing that at the time of his escape he was held on an infamous charge; since by Rem. & Bal. Code, § 2342, jail breaking is a felony only where the prisoner was held on a felony charge, and a misdemeanor if held otherwise.</p> <p>Statutes—Conflict of Laws—Extraterritorial Force of Foreign Laws. Where, under the law of this state, jail breaking was only a misdemeanor at the time the offense was committed in another state, the offense would not be an infamous crime, within the meaning of Rem. & Bal. Code, § 4768, denying the elective franchise to certain citizens, even if jail breaking were a felony in such other state; since the laws of such state could not be given extraterritorial
Judges: Ellis
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
9 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Kelli Jo Griffin v. Paul Pate, in His Official Capacities as the Secretary of State of Iowa, and Denise Fraise, in Her Official Capacities as the County Auditor of Lee County, IowaSupreme Court of Iowa· 2016-06-30· cited 23×
- Byrne v. CooperCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1974-07-08· cited 20×
- Herken v. GlynnSupreme Court of Kansas· 1940-05-04· cited 16×
- Farrakhan v. WashingtonNinth Circuit· 2004-02-24· cited 15×
- Gantenbein v. City of PascoWashington Supreme Court· 1913-01-23· cited 12×
- State v. RiveraCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1999-06-10· cited 9×
- State v. TribbleCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1980-06-09· cited 2×
- Farrakhan v. StateNinth Circuit· 2004-02-24· cited 2×
- Amended October 25, 2016 Kelli Jo Griffin v. Paul Pate, in His Official Capacities as the Secretary of State of Iowa, and Denise Fraise, in Her Official Capacities as the County Auditor of Lee County, IowaSupreme Court of Iowa· 2016-06-30
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.