Washington Supreme Court· 3/25/1993
State v. Collins
Citations
- 847 P.2d 919
- 121 Wash. 2d 168
- 1993 Wash. LEXIS 78
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that a petitioner had not properly raised a right to bear arms issue in his petition for review because he broached it only in his argument section, not in his petition's statement of issues as directed by RAP 13.4(c)(5)
- holding that a petitioner had not properly raised a right to bear arms issue in his petition for review because he broached it only in his argument section, not in his petition’s statement of issues as directed by RAP 13.4(c)(5)
- considering defendant’s prior access to a firearm, time of day of stop, and defendant’s prior felony arrest
- not appropriate to consider an issue raised for the first time in a supplemental brief after review has been accepted
- not appropriate to consider an issue raised for the first time in a supplemental brief after review has been accepted
- officers lawfully in a protected area may seize contraband they perceive with their senses, where the contraband is immediately recognizable as such by the officers
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Brachtenbach
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
56 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. HendricksonWashington Supreme Court· 1996-05-09· cited 744×
- State v. AcreyWashington Supreme Court· 2003-02-27· cited 204×
- State v. DuncanWashington Supreme Court· 2002-04-11· cited 196×
- State v. KorumWashington Supreme Court· 2006-08-17· cited 120×
- State v. HarringtonWashington Supreme Court· 2009-12-10· cited 81×
- State v. RussellWashington Supreme Court· 2014-07-10· cited 71×
- State v. VermillionCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2002-08-05· cited 54×
- Tuerk v. Department of LicensingWashington Supreme Court· 1994-01-13· cited 53×
- State v. WilliamsWashington Supreme Court· 2006-11-30· cited 45×
- State v. DumasSupreme Court of Louisiana· 2001-05-09· cited 37×
- State v. CoriaWashington Supreme Court· 2002-06-27· cited 35×
- Ongom v. Dept. of HealthWashington Supreme Court· 2006-12-14· cited 34×
- Ongom v. Department of HealthWashington Supreme Court· 2006-12-14· cited 32×
- Adams v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court· 1995-11-22· cited 31×
- 810 PROPERTIES v. JumpCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2007-11-13· cited 24×
- State v. HorraceWashington Supreme Court· 2001-08-02· cited 23×
- State v. KrajeskiCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2001-01-05· cited 23×
- State v. BarnesCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1999-06-24· cited 21×
- State v. GlossbrenerWashington Supreme Court· 2002-07-03· cited 21×
- City of Seattle v. MegreyCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1998-12-14· cited 19×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.