Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2/6/2002
State v. Collins
Citations
- 39 P.3d 925
- 179 Or. App. 384
- 2002 Ore. App. LEXIS 142
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- The Oregon Supreme Court has pre- viously construed “ ‘or’ in [ORS 164.205] subsection (3)(a) as being conjunctive. Under the rule of prior construction, that reading is conclusive.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Haselton, Linder, Wollheim
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
7 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2014-02-12· cited 12×
- State v. SweeneyCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2003-06-12· cited 4×
- J-G-D-FBoard of Immigration Appeals· 2017-07-01· cited 4×
- State v. EtzelCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2014-08-13· cited 1×
- State v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2004-01-28
- State v. NugentCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2014-02-12
- State v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2022-02-02
Cites
9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court· 1993-10-19· cited 2,400×
- Stull v. HokeOregon Supreme Court· 1997-11-14· cited 232×
- Palmer v. State of OregonOregon Supreme Court· 1994-02-25· cited 89×
- State v. CargillCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1990-01-31· cited 42×
- State v. HartfieldOregon Supreme Court· 1981-03-04· cited 39×
- State v. AndrewsCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2001-05-23· cited 29×
- State v. VaughnCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2001-07-05· cited 13×
- State v. RiddellCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2001-02-28· cited 8×
- State v. OceanCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1976-02-03· cited 7×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.