Washington Supreme Court· 6/12/2014
State v. Coley
Citations
- 180 Wash. 2d 543
- 326 P.3d 702
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that we must consider the context of the statute, related provisions, and the statutory scheme as a whole
- noting that we must consider the context of the statute, related provisions, and the statutory scheme as a whole
- the party challenging competency has the burden of proving incompetency by a preponderance of the evidence
- rejecting State's concession on dispositive burden of proof issue
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Fairhurst, González, Johnson, Madsen, McCloud, Owens, Stephens, Wiggins
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
12 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Cannabis Action Coalition v. City of KentWashington Supreme Court· 2015-05-21· cited 30×
- State v. McCarthy (In Re McCarthy)Washington Supreme Court· 2019-08-08· cited 21×
- State v. Ortiz-AbregoWashington Supreme Court· 2017-01-12· cited 15×
- Sibug v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2015-11-25· cited 7×
- State v. P.E.T.Court of Appeals of Washington· 2015-02-17· cited 5×
- State of Washington v. Matthew Sean McCarthyCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2018-11-15· cited 3×
- Department of Labor & Industries v. Cascadian Building Maintenance, Ltd.Court of Appeals of Washington· 2015-02-02· cited 3×
- State Of Washington, V. Delane Michael DuflothCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2021-10-04· cited 2×
- Cascadian Building Maintenance Ltd, App. v. Dept. Of Labor & Industries, St Of Wa, Resp.Court of Appeals of Washington· 2015-02-02
- State Of Washington v. P.e.t., D.o.b. 03/29/93Court of Appeals of Washington· 2015-02-17
- Cannabis Action Council v. City of KentWashington Supreme Court· 2015-05-21
- State v. ArmstrongWashington Supreme Court· 2017-05-11
Cites
25 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court· 1976-02-24· cited 16,859×
- Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1975-06-30· cited 11,585×
- Drope v. MissouriSupreme Court· 1975-02-19· cited 2,695×
- Department of Ecology v. Campbell & Gwinn, L.L.C.Washington Supreme Court· 2002-03-28· cited 1,615×
- State, Dept. of Ecology v. Campbell & GwinnWashington Supreme Court· 2002-03-28· cited 1,608×
- Medina v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1992-06-22· cited 1,180×
- State v. RohrichWashington Supreme Court· 2003-06-19· cited 387×
- State v. JacobsWashington Supreme Court· 2005-07-07· cited 385×
- State v. VangerpenWashington Supreme Court· 1995-02-09· cited 277×
- In re the Detention of TurayWashington Supreme Court· 1999-10-21· cited 217×
- State v. ErvinWashington Supreme Court· 2010-09-09· cited 193×
- In re the Personal Restraint of FlemingWashington Supreme Court· 2001-01-25· cited 157×
- State v. DrumWashington Supreme Court· 2010-01-21· cited 145×
- State v. MadsenWashington Supreme Court· 2010-03-25· cited 131×
- State v. HeddrickWashington Supreme Court· 2009-09-10· cited 90×
- In Re the Personal Restraint of RhomeWashington Supreme Court· 2011-09-15· cited 79×
- State v. HeddrickWashington Supreme Court· 2009-09-15· cited 79×
- State v. HahnWashington Supreme Court· 1986-10-09· cited 67×
- State v. WicklundWashington Supreme Court· 1982-01-14· cited 54×
- State v. HarrisWashington Supreme Court· 1990-03-29· cited 49×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.