Skip to main content

State v. Coleman

Citations

  • 2021 Ohio 968

Syllabus

The trial court did not err in denying appellant's request for a jury instruction on voluntary manslaughter where the evidence at trial did not reasonably support the instruction. The trial court did not err in entering a guilty verdict on a firearm specification accompanying count six of the indictment. Contrary to appellant's argument, the record reflects that the jury did return a guilty verdict on the specification, and the verdict form is part of the record. With regard to the State's cross-appeal, the trial court erred in merging appellant's conviction for discharging a firearm on or near a prohibited premises into his purposeful-murder conviction. The two offenses were not subject to merger because they were of dissimilar import or significance. The trial court also erred in not imposing a separate three-year prison sentence on a firearm specification accompanying appellant's conviction for discharging a firearm on or near a prohibited premises. Judgment affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded for a partial resentencing.

Judges: Hall

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.