District Court of Appeal of Florida· 9/30/2005
State v. Coleman
Citations
- 911 So. 2d 259
- 2005 WL 2396579
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the State can make a prima facie showing of probable cause based on a narcotic detection dog’s alert if it demonstrates that the dog has been “properly trained and certified”
- reversing trial court’s decision to éxclude evidence (rather than dismiss the case
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Torpy
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
12 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Harris v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2011-09-22· cited 31×
- State v. YeoumansIdaho Court of Appeals· 2007-11-02· cited 20×
- Gibson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-10-26· cited 12×
- Harris v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-09-04· cited 7×
- Tedder v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-03-07· cited 6×
- Lawrence William Patterson v. State of FloridaSupreme Court of Florida· 2016-08-25· cited 4×
- Wiggs v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2011-08-03· cited 2×
- State v. GibsonSupreme Court of Florida· 2008-07-03· cited 1×
- Harris v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2013-10-03· cited 1×
- State v. GrueDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2013-12-06· cited 1×
- Frost v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2011-01-26· cited 1×
- State v. McNealDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2010-06-04
Cites
3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.