Skip to main content

State v. Coleman

Citations

  • 711 P.2d 1251
  • 147 Ariz. 578
  • 1985 Ariz. App. LEXIS 754

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • affirming burglary conviction where window glass from a burgled home had the defendant’s fingerprints on both sides of the glass
  • explaining in case where defendant’s fingerprints were on both sides of a piece of broken glass from window that “[t]his kind of breaking and entry alone justifies an inference of an intent to commit a theft of property inside.”
  • “The essence of theft under our code is the obtaining of unlawful control over property of another with the intent to deprive.”
  • “The evidence of entry is the defendant’s fingerprints found on both sides of a piece of glass of the same shape and size as the piece missing from the victim’s broken window.”
  • “Both the intent to deprive and the control required for a theft conviction can be inferred from the unauthorized entry, the absence of the victim’s possessions, the presence of defendant’s fingerprints in a place inaccessible to the general public, and the absence of any other explanation.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gerber, Kleinschmidt, Eubank

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.