State v. Cole
Citations
- 93 Kan. 819
- 150 P. 233
- 1915 Kan. LEXIS 30
Syllabus
<p>SYLLABUS BY THE COURT.</p> <p>1. Crime — Larceny in the Nighttime — Insufficient Evidence. The evidence in this case is legally insufficient to justify a conviction of the felony charged, to wit: that the alleged larceny was committed in the nighttime.</p> <p>2. Same — Footprints—Insufficient Alone to Justify Conviction. Footprints of horses, if they correspond to those which would be made by the horses probably driven, and footprints of men, if they correspond to those which would be made by the shoes probably worn by the accused, are admissible as identifying evidence, yet alone are inadequate to justify a conviction of a crime. “</p>
Judges: Smith
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
7 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. BarrySupreme Court of Kansas· 1958-12-06· cited 15×
- State v. MarekSupreme Court of Kansas· 1930-02-08· cited 15×
- City of Wichita v. HibbsSupreme Court of Kansas· 1944-03-04· cited 14×
- State v. CarterSupreme Court of Kansas· 1927-02-12· cited 8×
- State v. ChristonCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 1979-06-01· cited 6×
- State v. FarrowSupreme Court of Kansas· 1923-07-07· cited 4×
- McKaig v. ParamoreTenth Circuit· 1968-10-03· cited 1×
Cites
5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Atchison & Eastern Bridge Co. v. MillerSupreme Court of Kansas· 1905-03-11· cited 32×
- State v. MillerSupreme Court of Kansas· 1912-06-08· cited 16×
- State v. BjorklandSupreme Court of Kansas· 1885-07-15· cited 13×
- In re BaumSupreme Court of Kansas· 1899-11-11· cited 9×
- City of Topeka v. KerschSupreme Court of Kansas· 1905-02-11· cited 8×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.