Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2/2/1994
State v. Coggin
Citations
- 126 Or. App. 230
- 868 P.2d 29
- 1994 Ore. App. LEXIS 116
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[a]n example of a delay that is presumptively prejudicial is an eight-and-one-half-year delay”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Durham, Edmonds, Tempore, Warren
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Doggett v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1992-06-24· cited 3,106×
- Application of HaynesOregon Supreme Court· 1980-11-04· cited 78×
- State v. MendeOregon Supreme Court· 1987-08-24· cited 55×
- State v. ChinnCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1992-10-21· cited 15×
- State v. EmeryCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1992-10-21· cited 8×
- State v. EmeryCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1992-01-06· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.