State v. Cockroft

Citations

• 2020 Ohio 4436

Syllabus

The trial court did not err in denying appellant's motion to vacate a void judgment. Appellant alleged the collaterally challenged judgment was void because the trial court did not expressly address the firearm specifications attached to two of his convictions. But because the trial court had subject-matter jurisdiction in the case and personal jurisdiction over appellant, any sentencing error committed in this omission would have made the judgment voidable, not void. Judgment affirmed.