State v. Coats

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that verdicts on two counts of unlawful use of a vehicle should have merged, where the defendant unlawfully used two vehicles in close succession, Cite as 344 Or App 327 (2025
• holding that verdicts on two counts of unlawful use of a vehicle should have merged, where the defendant unlawfully used two vehicles in close succession, Cite as 344 Or App 327 (2025
• “Given the qualified nature of the statement and its apparent reference to the past, it is not plain that the statement was impermissible vouching.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Wellington
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2024-04-17· cited 15×
• State v. Mankiller
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2025-10-22· cited 2×
• State v. Taylor
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2021-07-21· cited 1×

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Vanornum
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2013-12-27· cited 546×
• State v. Sperou
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2019-06-06· cited 120×
• State v. Dilallo
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2020-12-24· cited 66×
• State v. Huffman
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2010-03-03· cited 33×
• State v. Paye
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2021-04-07· cited 16×
• State v. Taylor
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2021-07-21· cited 1×