Court of Appeals of Washington· 7/30/1990
State v. Cleveland
Citations
- 794 P.2d 546
- 58 Wash. App. 634
- 1990 Wash. App. LEXIS 279
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the attorney general and county attorney constituted the same party for preclusion purposes, noting that \[t]he party against whom ... collateral estoppel is asserted is the State of Washington in both cases\
- therapist's testimony regarding typical behaviors of child victims of sexual abuse was admissible to aid jury in evaluating victim's testimony
- expert testimony about the general characteristics of child sex abuse victims properly admitted
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Scholfield
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
43 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. ThorgersonWashington Supreme Court· 2011-08-25· cited 702×
- State v. GregoryWashington Supreme Court· 2006-11-30· cited 392×
- Christensen v. Grant County Hospital District No. 1Washington Supreme Court· 2004-08-26· cited 195×
- State v. CheatamWashington Supreme Court· 2003-12-11· cited 160×
- State v. WilliamsWashington Supreme Court· 1997-06-05· cited 131×
- State v. TiliWashington Supreme Court· 2003-01-09· cited 105×
- Thompson v. Department of LicensingWashington Supreme Court· 1999-08-19· cited 103×
- Thompson v. State Dept. of LicensingWashington Supreme Court· 1999-08-19· cited 102×
- State v. BarrowCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1991-04-15· cited 66×
- State v. J.Q.New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1991-11-14· cited 52×
- State v. StatenCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1991-01-14· cited 41×
- State v. CastleCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1997-04-28· cited 41×
- State v. VasquezWashington Supreme Court· 2002-12-19· cited 41×
- State v. ChhomWashington Supreme Court· 1996-03-07· cited 36×
- State v. SandersCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1992-07-13· cited 34×
- State v. VasquezCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2001-11-27· cited 34×
- State v. BryantWashington Supreme Court· 2002-04-04· cited 32×
- People v. MorenoAppellate Court of Illinois· 2001-02-02· cited 16×
- State v. Mullin-CostonCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2003-02-18· cited 16×
- State v. DixonCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2009-05-05· cited 12×
Cites
18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court· 1970-05-18· cited 11,712×
- Ashe v. SwensonSupreme Court· 1970-04-20· cited 4,277×
- Frye v. United StatesD.C. Circuit· 1923-12-03· cited 4,204×
- Benton v. MarylandSupreme Court· 1969-06-23· cited 4,063×
- Yates v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1957-06-17· cited 1,277×
- State v. GuloyWashington Supreme Court· 1985-09-05· cited 721×
- Standefer v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1980-06-09· cited 693×
- United States v. OppenheimerSupreme Court· 1916-12-04· cited 417×
- Harris v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1971-11-16· cited 200×
- State v. BlackWashington Supreme Court· 1987-11-05· cited 192×
- State v. CiskieWashington Supreme Court· 1988-03-17· cited 137×
- State v. DupardWashington Supreme Court· 1980-04-10· cited 117×
- Henderson v. Bardahl International Corp.Washington Supreme Court· 1967-09-21· cited 58×
- State v. TraweekCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1986-03-07· cited 52×
- Beagles v. Seattle-First National BankCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1980-04-25· cited 38×
- Lockwood v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1984-10-02· cited 34×
- State v. HarrisWashington Supreme Court· 1971-02-04· cited 24×
- State v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1970-04-07· cited 21×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.