Ohio Court of Appeals· 8/9/2024
State v. Cleveland
Citations
- 2024 Ohio 3039
Syllabus
Sulek - Trial court did not err in finding that Alford plea was knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily made where it engaged in a Crim.R. 11 colloquy with the defendant and the defendant used one-word answers to respond that he understood the nature of the charges and maximum penalties involved, the effect of the plea, and the rights he was waiving.
Judges: Suleck
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court· 1969-06-02· cited 12,640×
- State v. NeroOhio Supreme Court· 1990-12-19· cited 1,637×
- State v. EngleOhio Supreme Court· 1996-02-14· cited 784×
- State v. Dangler (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2020-05-05· cited 408×
- State v. ParksOhio Court of Appeals· 2019-06-14· cited 12×
- State v. GummOhio Court of Appeals· 2022-06-30· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.