State v. Clarke

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that the search-incident-to-arrest rule exists because “‘an arrest * * * creates a type of exigency justifying a warrantless search of the arrested person’” (quoting State v. Milligan, 304 Or 659, 669, 748 P2d 130 (1988)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Kruchek
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1998-10-28· cited 28×
• State v. Krause
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2016-09-21· cited 23×
• State v. Nix
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2010-06-23· cited 6×

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Owens
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1986-11-20· cited 434×
• State v. Caraher
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1982-11-02· cited 274×
• State v. Quinn
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1981-01-20· cited 183×
• State v. Milligan
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1988-01-06· cited 67×
• State v. Ridderbush
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1984-12-19· cited 39×
• State v. McCoy
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1968-02-21· cited 35×
• State v. Holmes
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1974-05-28· cited 27×
• State v. Zigler
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1990-03-14· cited 11×