State v. Clarke

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that exclusion of evidence is appropriate only when no lesser sanction would accomplish the purpose of the criminal discovery rules
• noting that exclusion of evidence is appropriate only when no lesser sanction would accomplish the purpose of the criminal discovery rules

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In Re Littlefield
  California Supreme Court· 1993-05-20· cited 123×
• State v. Ahlo
  Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals· 1995-09-27· cited 17×
• State v. Johanesen
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1991-12-18· cited 8×

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Mai
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1982-12-29· cited 72×
• State v. York
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1981-09-09· cited 24×
• State v. Ben
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1990-09-20· cited 21×
• State v. Ben
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1989-07-26· cited 6×