State v. Clark

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that “when determining whether a driver is guilty of a reckless crime, [the trier of fact] must focus on the driver’s decision making, not just his or her driving”
• explaining that “when determining whether a driver is guilty of a reckless crime, [the trier of fact] must focus on the driver’s decision making, not just his or her driving”
• defense counsel failed to preserve an issue by withdrawing his request for a clarifying instruction in colloquy
• “[W]hen determining whether a driver is guilty of a reckless crime, a jury must focus on the driver’s decision making, not just his or her driving.”
• discussing import of recklessness under ORS 161.085(9)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. S. N. R.
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2014-01-29· cited 9×
• May v. Woods
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2018-09-19· cited 3×
• State v. Martsch
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2019-04-03· cited 2×
• State v. Rossiter
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2019-10-16· cited 2×

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Bowen
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2006-05-11· cited 58×
• State v. Stringer
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1982-01-25· cited 34×
• Morehouse v. Haynes
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2011-05-19· cited 13×
• Maas v. Willer
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2005-12-14· cited 13×
• State v. Stringer
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1981-09-09· cited 12×
• State v. Stringer
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1980-11-03· cited 8×
• State v. Tucker
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2011-03-16· cited 4×