State v. Clark
Citations
- 4 Idaho 7
- 35 P. 710
- 1894 Ida. LEXIS 12
Syllabus
<p>Preliminary Examination — Commitment.—An order of commitment made in writing and entered in the docket of the committing magistrate is valid, although not indorsed on the depositions taken at the preliminary examination.</p> <p>Depositions — Section 7576 oe the Revised Statutes Construed.— Held, that the record in this case shows a substantial compliance with the provisions of section 7576 of the Revised Statutes in taking depositions and certifying same to the district court. Information — Jurisdiction—Waiver.—Motion to quash information, on the ground that the court had no jurisdiction to try the defendant, for the reason that the law had not been complied with in. the arrest and preliminary examination of the defendant, must be made before plea or trial, or the same is waived.</p> <p>Defects in Preliminary Examination. — Technicalities or defects in the preliminary examination of a defendant will not render them invalid, unless they actually prejudice the defendant, or tend to his prejudice in respect to some substantial right.</p> <p>(Syllabus by the court.)</p>
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- compliance with all requirements except certification substantially satisfies legislative mandate and later certification proper
- compliance with all requirements except certification substantially satisfies legislative mandate and later certification proper
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Huston, Morgan, Sullivan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
20 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. SpearsWyoming Supreme Court· 1956-07-24· cited 69×
- State v. AyresIdaho Supreme Court· 1949-11-02· cited 52×
- Bush v. MartinS.D. Texas· 1966-01-05· cited 39×
- Freeman v. StateIdaho Supreme Court· 1964-04-27· cited 36×
- State v. LarkinsIdaho Supreme Court· 1897-02-11· cited 36×
- Cobas v. ClappIdaho Supreme Court· 1957-12-12· cited 29×
- State v. MeeIdaho Supreme Court· 1981-07-21· cited 25×
- State v. PoynterIdaho Supreme Court· 1950-05-18· cited 24×
- Miranda v. StateArizona Supreme Court· 1933-10-30· cited 24×
- State v. RuddellIdaho Supreme Court· 1976-02-26· cited 21×
- State v. MainIdaho Supreme Court· 1923-07-05· cited 18×
- In re MarshallIdaho Supreme Court· 1899-03-18· cited 16×
- State v. McKennaIdaho Supreme Court· 1957-03-28· cited 15×
- In re KnudtsonIdaho Supreme Court· 1905-02-28· cited 15×
- State v. PrestonIdaho Supreme Court· 1894-12-17· cited 12×
- State v. CronkIdaho Supreme Court· 1957-02-26· cited 8×
- State v. CollinsIdaho Supreme Court· 1894-10-29· cited 6×
- Laffey v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado· 1913-10-06· cited 5×
- State v. PierceIdaho Supreme Court· 2011-01-04· cited 4×
- State v. Luis James PierceIdaho Supreme Court· 2010-10-13
Cites
9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Washburn v. PeopleMichigan Supreme Court· 1862-07-17· cited 69×
- People v. BawdenCalifornia Supreme Court· 1891-07-14· cited 33×
- Bailey v. StateNebraska Supreme Court· 1893-04-26· cited 26×
- State v. ReedIdaho Supreme Court· 1894-01-12· cited 23×
- Ex parte McConnellCalifornia Supreme Court· 1890-04-11· cited 21×
- Hodgkins v. StateNebraska Supreme Court· 1893-01-18· cited 20×
- People v. WilsonCalifornia Supreme Court· 1892-02-12· cited 19×
- State v. BraithwaiteIdaho Supreme Court· 1891-09-28· cited 13×
- People v. WilliamsMichigan Supreme Court· 1892-12-02· cited 9×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.