State v. Clark
Citations
- 43 Wash. 664
- 86 P. 1067
- 1906 Wash. LEXIS 766
Syllabus
<p>Statute — Subject and Titles — Chimes. The title to Laws 1890, page 128, “an act for the protection of builders,” is unconstitutional as misleading where the subject of the act is the punishment of any person supplying labor or material for any purpose who collects the price upon falsely representing that it has been paid íot.</p> <p>Same — Title—Ambiguity. ' An act entitled, “an act for the protection of builders” is too ambiguous and indefinite to serve any purpose, and is unconstitutional for failure to express the subject of the act.</p>
Judges: Rudkin
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
10 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Fritz v. GortonWashington Supreme Court· 1974-01-04· cited 149×
- National Ass'n of Creditors, Inc. v. BrownWashington Supreme Court· 1928-03-05· cited 29×
- Bradley Engineering & Machinery Co. v. MuzzyWashington Supreme Court· 1909-07-17· cited 15×
- Harvey v. PocockWashington Supreme Court· 1916-08-29· cited 12×
- State v. MerchantWashington Supreme Court· 1907-12-11· cited 10×
- Waddington v. WickMissouri Court of Appeals· 1983-03-29· cited 8×
- State v. StannardCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2006-08-29· cited 6×
- Il Kim v. Pollution Control Hearings BoardCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2003-01-24· cited 4×
- Kim v. Pollution Control Hearing Bd.Court of Appeals of Washington· 2003-01-24· cited 3×
- State ex rel. Great Northern Railway Co. v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court· 1912-05-31· cited 3×
Cites
2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.