State v. Clark
Citations
- 2019 Ohio 3196
Syllabus
The trial court incorrectly informed appellant at the sentencing hearing and in the sentencing entry that he could be placed on post-release control for \three years\ when R.C. 2967.28(C) actually provides that he could be placed on post-release control for \up to three years.\ The State concedes and we agree that this error renders the post-release-control portion of appellant's sentence void. Because appellant has already completed his one-year prison sentence, the trial court no longer has authority to resentence him to the appropriate term of post-release control. The portion of appellant's sentence related to post-release control is vacated.
Judges: Welbaum
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. FischerOhio Supreme Court· 2010-12-23· cited 1,066×
- State v. JordanOhio Supreme Court· 2004-12-01· cited 641×
- State v. QuallsOhio Supreme Court· 2012-03-20· cited 244×
- State v. HoldcroftOhio Supreme Court· 2013-11-20· cited 230×
- State v. BloomerOhio Supreme Court· 2009-06-09· cited 203×
- State ex rel. Womack v. MarshOhio Supreme Court· 2011-01-25· cited 160×
- State v. BilliterOhio Supreme Court· 2012-11-07· cited 111×
- State v. CollinsOhio Court of Appeals· 2018-11-30· cited 13×
- State v. AdkinsOhio Court of Appeals· 2011-06-10· cited 11×
- State v. TanksleyOhio Court of Appeals· 2016-05-13· cited 7×
- State v. HuberOhio Court of Appeals· 2014-05-16· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.