State v. Clark

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the state failed to preserve the issue of whether the specific reasons given for imposition of downward departure sentence were invalid where at sentencing the state did not object on the same grounds argued on appeal
• issue of whether specific reasons given for imposition of downward departure sentence were invalid not preserved by state where at sentencing state did not object on same grounds argued on appeal
• general objection to imposition of downward departure sentence is insufficient to challenge the validity of a downward departure sentence or the sufficiency of the evidence supporting the departure reasons

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Hamner
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-05-17· cited 10×
• State v. Carlson
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-09-28· cited 8×
• J.J.T. v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-02-19· cited 8×
• JJT v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-02-19
• State v. Boes
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2011-01-26
• State v. W.D.G.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2000-11-28
• Ervin v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2001-02-08
• State v. Deluce
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-05-09
• State v. Clark
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2001-12-20

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Tillman v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1985-06-06· cited 309×
• E & I, INC. v. Excavators, Inc.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1997-07-02· cited 18×
• State v. Barnes
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2000-02-18· cited 16×