Skip to main content

State v. Clark

Citations

  • 615 S.E.2d 143
  • 273 Ga. App. 411
  • 2005 Fulton County D. Rep. 1529
  • 2005 Ga. App. LEXIS 458

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that a motion for DNA testing may be filed before or in conjunction with the filing of extraordinary motion for new trial
  • noting that a motion for DNA testing may be filed before or in conjunction with the filing of extraordinary motion for new trial
  • reviewing a motion for postconviction DNA testing that was filed without an accompanying extraordinary motion for a new trial
  • also acknowledging the State’s argument that if evidence was destroyed during testing by an unaccredited laboratory, the State could not have it retested by an accredited laboratory
  • state may appeal directly from the trial court’s order granting the defendant’s motion for DNA testing, because that motion was not made as part of an extraordinary motion for new trial
  • appeal of order granting post-conviction DNA testing

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Phipps, Johnson, Mikell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.