Ohio Court of Appeals· 12/23/2024
State v. Clark
Citations
- 2024 Ohio 6001
Syllabus
CRIMINAL LAW - prosecutorial misconduct; prosecutor has wide latitude in closing arguments; prosecutor may not comment on a defendant's failure to testify; comments during closing argument did not rise to the level of prosecutorial misconduct.
Judges: Patton
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1965-04-28· cited 4,680×
- State v. LottOhio Supreme Court· 1990-06-06· cited 1,930×
- State v. ApanovitchOhio Supreme Court· 1987-10-07· cited 870×
- State v. LaMarOhio Supreme Court· 2002-05-15· cited 477×
- State v. WebbOhio Supreme Court· 1994-09-21· cited 262×
- Tad R. Knowles v. United StatesTenth Circuit· 1955-06-22· cited 248×
- State v. DavisOhio Supreme Court· 1996-07-24· cited 161×
- State v. CollinsOhio Supreme Court· 2000-09-06· cited 123×
- State v. GarrettOhio Supreme Court· 2022-11-30· cited 61×
- Drake v. Caterpillar Tractor Co.Ohio Supreme Court· 1984-12-31· cited 32×
- State v. HamadOhio Court of Appeals· 2019-06-28· cited 7×
- State v. LightOhio Court of Appeals· 2023-04-10· cited 7×
- State v. O'NeilOhio Court of Appeals· 2024-02-12· cited 7×
- State v. VaughnOhio Court of Appeals· 2019-01-28· cited 4×
- State v. PayneOhio Court of Appeals· 2024-09-26· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.