State v. CIRESI

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that \the 'raise-or-waive' rule precludes a litigant from arguing an issue on appeal that has not been articulated at trial\
• noting that the well-established “ ‘raise-or-waive’ rule precludes a litigant from arguing an issue on appeal that has not been articulated at trial”
• noting that it is “well established” that the rule “precludes a litigant from arguing an issue on appeal that has not been articulated at trial”
• noting that it is “well established” that the rule “precludes a litigant from arguing an issue on appeal that has not been articulated at trial”
• admission of uncharged bad conduct was harmless in light of the overwhelming evidence presented against the defendant at trial
• “[E]vidence of a separate crime may be admissible if it has independent relevance in respect to the proof of an element material to the chain of proof of the crime in issue.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).