· 5/22/2003
State v. Chukes
Citations
- 2003 UT App 155
- 71 P.3d 624
- 474 Utah Adv. Rep. 18
- 2003 Utah App. LEXIS 51
- 2003 WL 21195331
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that “[i]dentity fraud does not require that the defendant in fact obtained something of value”
- stating that “[i]dentity fraud does not require that the defendant in fact obtained something of value”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Bench, Davis, Orme
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.