State v. Christensen

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the bailiff’s comments about the impracticability of reconvening court to consider its questions hastened the jury’s verdict
• holding that the bailiff’s comments about the impracticability of reconvening court to consider its questions hastened the jury’s verdict

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Adkins v. ALUMINUM COMPANY OF AM.
  Washington Supreme Court· 1988-06-09· cited 148×
• State v. Russell
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1980-04-28· cited 30×
• State v. Smalls
  Washington Supreme Court· 1983-06-09· cited 17×
• State Of Washington, Resp-cross App v. John Alan Whitaker, App-cross
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2018-11-05· cited 17×
• State v. Saraceno
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1979-06-05· cited 11×
• State v. Magnano
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2014-06-09· cited 5×
• State v. Smalls
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1982-08-02· cited 3×
• State Of Washington v. Matthew Mchugh Magnano
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2014-06-09
• State Of Washington, V. Joseph Henry Hall
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2022-01-10
• State Of Washington, V. Joseph Henry Hall
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2022-04-11

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Gardner v. Malone
  Washington Supreme Court· 1962-11-29· cited 114×
• State v. Thompson
  Washington Supreme Court· 1977-01-06· cited 95×
• O'BRIEN v. City of Seattle
  Washington Supreme Court· 1958-07-03· cited 44×
• State v. Smith
  Washington Supreme Court· 1953-09-21· cited 18×
• State v. Gregor
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1974-04-25· cited 11×
• State v. Moore
  Washington Supreme Court· 1951-02-23· cited 7×