Skip to main content
· 6/11/1986

State v. Christen/Hankins

Citations

  • 720 P.2d 1303
  • 79 Or. App. 774
  • 1986 Ore. App. LEXIS 2940

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that high electric bills by themselves did not establish probable cause that a marijuana grow existed, but when combined with other facts, demonstrated probable cause to believe that illegal activity was occurring on the premises to be searched
  • holding that high electric bills by themselves did not establish probable cause that a marijuana grow existed, but when combined with other facts, demonstrated probable cause to believe that illegal activity was occurring on the premises to be searched

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Buttler, Warren, Rossman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.