State v. Chrisco

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• court stated that “[w]hile we agree that supporting a family may be a proper departure factor in certain cases, its application is questionable when there is reason to believe a defendant may harm the very children he is supporting”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Hines
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2013-02-15· cited 32×
• State v. Theurer
  Court of Appeals of Kansas· 2014-11-21· cited 23×

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Gideon
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1995-04-28· cited 83×
• State v. Favela
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1996-02-16· cited 77×
• State v. Richardson
  Court of Appeals of Kansas· 1995-04-21· cited 46×
• State v. Grady
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1995-07-14· cited 34×
• Stoskopf v. Stoskopf
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1952-07-03· cited 11×