· 4/5/1974
State v. Chounard
Citations
- 216 N.W.2d 908
- 299 Minn. 216
- 1974 Minn. LEXIS 1449
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- rejecting the defendant’s argument that the district court should have interrogated him more thoroughly on the record because the 8 plea hearing transcript showed that the defendant discussed the consequences of the plea with counsel
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Per Curiam
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.