Skip to main content
· 4/5/1974

State v. Chounard

Citations

  • 216 N.W.2d 908
  • 299 Minn. 216
  • 1974 Minn. LEXIS 1449

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • rejecting the defendant’s argument that the district court should have interrogated him more thoroughly on the record because the 8 plea hearing transcript showed that the defendant discussed the consequences of the plea with counsel

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.