State v. Chmura
Citations
- 2024 Ohio 2638
Syllabus
Postrelease control PRC R.C. 2967.28 R.C. 2953.08(G)(2) leave to appeal R.C. 2953.08(A)(2) consecutive sentences R.C. 2929.14(C)(4) R.C. 2929.13(B) community-control sanctions. Judgment is affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded. Chmura's consecutive-sentencing argument cannot be reviewed because R.C. 2953.08(A)(2) bars appellate review of a prison term imposed upon a fourth- or fifth-degree felony pursuant to R.C. 2929.13(B), absent a motion for leave. Nevertheless, Chmura's argument regarding PRC is sustained, because the trial court failed to advise Chmura of PRC at the sentencing hearing but imposed it in the sentencing entry. Therefore, the case is remanded to the trial court for the sole purpose of advising Chmura of PRC.
Judges: Boyle
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.