Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1/10/1994
State v. Chisolm
Citations
- 439 S.E.2d 850
- 312 S.C. 235
- 1994 S.C. LEXIS 8
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- prosecutor improperly and secretly taped telephone conversation with defendant, who had called prosecutor but had an attorney
- solicitor not required to plea bargain with appellant charged with murder when appellant wishes to plead to voluntary manslaughter
- prosecutor improperly audiotaped telephone conversation with defendant, who was represented by counsel
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Finney, Harwell, Chandler, Toal, Moore
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
8 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. NeedsSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1998-11-23· cited 76×
- State v. WhippleSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1996-07-01· cited 50×
- State v. EaslerCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1996-05-13· cited 23×
- State v. BellCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2007-06-04· cited 16×
- State v. HawesCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2018-03-14· cited 14×
- State v. CaldwellCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2008-05-15· cited 9×
- State v. WilsonSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2010-05-24· cited 9×
- State v. HuttoCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2003-11-17· cited 1×
Cites
2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.