State v. Chisholm

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “A mere possibility of harm that may occur sometime in the future is insufficient.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Thayer
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 2010-08-20· cited 9×
• State v. Beavers
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 2010-12-08· cited 5×
• State v. Troy Cameron Young
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 2014-09-24· cited 2×

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• United States v. Bailey
  Supreme Court· 1980-01-21· cited 1,333×
• Vaughn v. Hinchy
  Supreme Court· 1983-01-17· cited 78×
• State v. Aver
  Washington Supreme Court· 1987-11-05· cited 71×
• United States v. Seward
  Tenth Circuit· 1982-06-17· cited 61×
• State v. Kenner
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1992-02-26· cited 49×
• Commonwealth v. Berrigan
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1985-11-22· cited 49×
• State v. Warshow
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1979-12-21· cited 42×
• State v. Hastings
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1990-11-27· cited 34×
• Martin v. Pennsylvania State Real Estate Commission
  Supreme Court· 1989-10-02· cited 11×
• United States v. Schoon
  Ninth Circuit· 1991-07-29· cited 6×
• Manning v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1992-06-15· cited 1×