Skip to main content
· 8/2/1990

State v. Chicoine

Citations

  • 154 Vt. 653
  • 580 A.2d 970
  • 1990 Vt. LEXIS 114

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[A] federal court cannot address the merits of a dispute unless it satisfies itself that subject-matter jurisdiction exists.”
  • “[A] federal court cannot address the merits of a dispute unless it satisfies itself that subject-matter jurisdiction exists.”
  • “[A] federal 5 In Bonner v. City of Prichard, 661 F.2d 1206, 1209 (11th Cir. 1981) (en banc
  • “[A] federal court cannot address the merits of a dispute unless it satisfies itself that subject-matter jurisdiction exists.” (citing Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better Env’t, 523 U.S. 83, 101–02 (1998))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.