State v. Chevallier
Citations
- 824 S.E.2d 440
- 264 N.C. App. 204
Syllabus
A single transfer by sale or delivery of a counterfeit controlled substance is a single offense admission of hearsay statement under Rule 801(d)(E)?s co-conspirator exception motions to dismiss for insufficiency of the evidence charges of transfer of a counterfeit controlled substance under the theories of attempted sale and delivery instruction on actual possession theory of possession of a firearm by a felon.
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating in a criminal context that “[w]e review de novo properly preserved sufficiency-of-the- evidence challenges to jury instructions”
- “In determining whether the trial evidence adduced was sufficient to instruct on a particular theory of criminal liability, we review the evidence and any reasonable inference from that evidence in the light most favorable to the State.”
- “In determining whether the trial evidence adduced was sufficient to instruct on a particular theory of criminal liability, we review the evidence and any reasonable inference from that evidence in the light most favorable to the State.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Collins
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. PierreCourt of Appeals of North Carolina· 2019-12-17
- State v. MeaderSupreme Court of North Carolina· 2021-04-16
- State v. ElderCourt of Appeals of North Carolina· 2021-07-20
- State v. MillerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina· 2020-12-31
- Creech v. Town of CorneliusCourt of Appeals of North Carolina· 2024-12-17
Cites
5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. ChekanowSupreme Court of North Carolina· 2018-03-02· cited 69×
- State v. LeeSupreme Court of North Carolina· 2018-04-06· cited 64×
- State v. MeltonSupreme Court of North Carolina· 2018-12-07· cited 44×
- State v. MalachiSupreme Court of North Carolina· 2018-12-07· cited 37×
- State v. HicksCourt of Appeals of North Carolina· 2015-10-20· cited 25×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.