State v. Chesnokov

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• merger doctrine’s purpose is to correct violations of the prohibition of double jeopardy
• merger doctrine’s purpose is to correct violations of the prohibition of double jeopardy

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Aekins v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2014-10-22· cited 101×
• State Of Washington v. Derek Whittaker
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2016-02-01· cited 16×
• State of Washington v. Bisir Bilal Muhammad
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2018-06-07· cited 3×

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Blockburger v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1931-12-11· cited 10,676×
• State v. Calle
  Washington Supreme Court· 1995-01-26· cited 348×
• State v. Freeman
  Washington Supreme Court· 2005-03-17· cited 261×
• State v. Vladovic
  Washington Supreme Court· 1983-04-28· cited 258×
• State v. Michielli
  Washington Supreme Court· 1997-05-29· cited 257×
• State v. Kier
  Washington Supreme Court· 2008-10-09· cited 141×
• State v. Hughes
  Washington Supreme Court· 2009-07-23· cited 95×
• State v. Parmelee
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2001-10-15· cited 50×

Other cases named State v. Chesnokov

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

• State v. CHESNOKOV
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2008-11-26
• State v. CHESNOKOV
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2008-08-27