Skip to main content

State v. Cherry

Citations

  • 801 So. 2d 278
  • 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 17496
  • 2001 WL 1576199

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that prosecutor’s statement to court, prior to imposition of sentence, informed court of. statutory requirement that sentence was required to be consecutive to other sentences, and preserved for appellate review state’s objection to imposition of concurrent sentence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Dell, Taylor, Warner

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.