State v. Cherry

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that complaint charging defendant with unlawfully engaging in disorderly conduct by urinating in public described offense with sufficient particularity
• finding that complaint charging defendant with unlawfully engaging in disorderly conduct by urinating in public described offense with sufficient particularity

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Villarreal
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1999-09-30· cited 36×
• People v. Cooke
  South Nyack Justice Court· 1991-10-18· cited 7×
• State v. Brooks
  Nebraska Court of Appeals· 1997-02-18· cited 4×

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Sukovaty
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1965-05-28· cited 11×
• State v. Novak
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1951-01-19· cited 9×
• Rolfsmeier v. State
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1957-02-01· cited 1×