State v. Chepilko

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that most commercial conduct is not expressive and even overlapping conduct by a photographer is not entitled to First Amendment protection
• recognizing that most commercial conduct is not expressive and even overlapping conduct by a photographer is not entitled to First Amendment protection
• observing that “the fact that some photography qualifies as expressive conduct entitled to First Amendment protection” does not mean the defendant’s sale of photographs on a boardwalk is protected

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).