· 9/6/2022
State v. Cheers
Syllabus
satellite-based monitoring term of 30 years trial court's jurisdiction to conduct SBM hearing recidivist also convicted of offense involving physical, mental, or sexual abuse of minor sufficient findings to support highest possible level of supervision
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that “the jury never heard many of the[] exchanges” that counsel argued caused their clients prejudice
- “[D]ifficulties with the judge did not affect [counsels’] representation of their clients so as to deny them a fair trial.”
- “[N]either taking property without a right nor distribution of drugs constitutes a crime of dishonesty or false statement.”
- “Despite [counsel’s] assertions to the contrary, we find that his exchanges with the district court did not dampen his zealous (perhaps even overly so) representation of [his client]. The record illustrates that [counsel] repeatedly and aggressively pursued his client’s cause.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.