State v. Cheeney

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that while the State may have provided the defendant with a stack of documents regarding restitution, the stack was not presented to the district court and “[t]he district court therefore could not rely upon it”
• holding that while the State may have provided the defendant with a stack of documents regarding restitution, the stack was not presented to the district court and “[t]he district court therefore could not rely upon it”
• vacating an order of restitution to an insurance company where the State failed to present evidence of a contractual relationship with the primary victim

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).