State v. Cheatham
Citations
- 2021 Ohio 2495
Syllabus
SPEEDY-TRIAL– CONTINUANCE – WAIVER –DISCOVERY – CRIM.R. 16(K): The trial court did not err by dismissing defendant's felony charges after the state failed to try defendant within the 90-day statutory period where the source of the delay was the state's discovery violation. Where defendant sought a continuance based on the state's violation of Crim.R. 16, any delay resulting from that violation shall be charged to the state. Where nothing in the record showed that defendant explicitly waived the speedy-trial time, the reviewing court must focus on the underlying source of the delay.
Judges: Bock
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
6 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. SweeneyOhio Court of Appeals· 2024-09-06· cited 6×
- State v. RossOhio Court of Appeals· 2024-08-16· cited 4×
- State v. WallaceOhio Court of Appeals· 2024-10-09· cited 4×
- State v. McConicoOhio Court of Appeals· 2024-12-04· cited 2×
- State v. BrownOhio Court of Appeals· 2026-04-29· cited 2×
- State v. KingOhio Court of Appeals· 2026-06-24· cited 1×
Cites
4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.