State v. Chavez

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that, by asserting that one ground was dispositive, the defendant was implicitly telling the trial court not to consider an alternative ground
• holding that, by asserting that one ground was dispositive, the defendant was implicitly telling the trial court not to consider an alternative ground
• holding that, by asserting that one ground was dispositive, the defendant was implicitly telling the trial court not to consider an alternative ground
• applying Wyatt to hold that, where a party affir- matively tells the trial court it is not pursuing a specific argument, that argument is not preserved for appellate review

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Parkins
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2009-06-25· cited 123×
• State v. Turley
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2005-10-12· cited 14×
• State v. Calvert
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2007-07-25· cited 4×
• State ex rel Select Reform Com. v. City of Jefferson
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2020-08-26· cited 4×
• State v. Bighouse
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2008-10-22· cited 3×
• State v. Hayes
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2003-01-29· cited 2×
• State v. Plumb
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2004-03-31· cited 1×

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Wyatt
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2000-12-01· cited 659×
• State v. Chavez
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2001-02-07· cited 2×