State v. Charlton

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• evidence must present unmistakable justification for imposition of the doctrine when a municipality has acted in its governmental capacity

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• County of Hawai'i v. C & J Coupe Family Ltd. Partnership
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 2008-12-24· cited 49×
• City of Mercer Island v. Steinmann
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1973-08-06· cited 31×
• Bonanza Real Estate, Inc. v. Crouch
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1974-01-07· cited 14×
• Brust v. McDONALD'S CORPORATION
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1983-03-07· cited 11×
• Alaska Marine Trucking v. Carnation Co.
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1981-08-10· cited 6×
• PARKS & RECREATION v. Schluneger
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1970-10-30· cited 4×
• Tucson Electric Power Co. v. Adams
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1982-10-20· cited 3×
• Tom Nakamura, Inc. v. G & G Produce Co.
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1973-10-02· cited 1×
• Kane v. City of Bainbridge Island
  W.D. Washington· 2011-12-02· cited 1×

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State Ex Rel. Shannon v. Sponburgh
  Washington Supreme Court· 1965-04-29· cited 49×
• North Coast Railroad v. Kraft Co.
  Washington Supreme Court· 1911-04-21· cited 21×
• Carruthers v. Whitney
  Washington Supreme Court· 1909-12-14· cited 19×
• Public Utility District No. 1 v. Cooper
  Washington Supreme Court· 1966-12-14· cited 17×
• State Ex Rel. Devonshire v. SUPER. CT. FOR KING CTY.
  Washington Supreme Court· 1967-03-02· cited 14×
• State ex rel. Lincoln v. Superior Court
  Washington Supreme Court· 1920-07-20· cited 6×