State v. Charlie

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• although the court stated that no prejudice had been established, the defendant appears to have been prejudiced by the delay in the submission of findings and conclusions
• findings filed 2 years after notice of appeal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In re the Marriage of Moody
  Washington Supreme Court· 1999-05-27· cited 119×
• In Re Marriage of Moody
  Washington Supreme Court· 1999-05-27· cited 110×
• State v. McCrorey
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1993-05-03· cited 32×
• State v. Denison
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1995-07-13· cited 20×
• State v. Pena
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1992-05-19· cited 17×
• State v. Lown
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2003-04-10· cited 16×
• Perez v. Garcia
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2009-01-06· cited 12×
• State v. Moore
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1993-07-26· cited 6×
• State v. Litts
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1992-04-06· cited 6×
• State v. Pulido
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1992-12-21· cited 6×
• State v. Cowgill
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1993-02-09· cited 4×
• State v. Taylor
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1993-04-26· cited 1×

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• In Re the Estate of Larson
  Washington Supreme Court· 1985-01-11· cited 89×
• State v. Fellers
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1984-05-21· cited 37×
• State v. Commodore
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1984-07-23· cited 27×
• In Re the Welfare of Smith
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1973-01-30· cited 23×
• State v. Bennett
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1991-09-04· cited 15×
• State v. Royster
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1986-05-12· cited 12×