State v. Charles Mitchell

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that evidence that the defendant touched the complainant's older sister was relevant to demonstrate his specific intent to sexually gratify in touching the complainant
• “[T]he evidence of defendant’s touching Selina was reasonably necessary to support Hannah’s credibility.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).