Ohio Court of Appeals· 11/7/2025
State v. Charles
Citations
- 2025 Ohio 5062
Syllabus
Appellant did not object and, therefore, waived the issue of his ability to pay financial sanctions and court costs for his misdemeanor offenses for purposes of appeal. Because appellant pled guilty to attempted theft and obstruction, the court was not required to make findings of guilt based upon any explanation of circumstances. Judgment affirmed.
Judges: Huffman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCites
5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.