Mississippi Supreme Court· 10/15/1912
State v. Chapman
Citations
- 103 Miss. 658
- 60 So. 722
Syllabus
<p>Forgery. Indictment. Extrinsic facts.</p> <p>Where the effect of an instrument, alleged to be forged does not affirmatively and with sufficient clearness appear on its face, it is necessary to set forth in the indictment extraneous facts in order to invest the instrument with legal force and make it the subject of forgery.</p>
Judges: Reed
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCites
2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.