Skip to main content

State v. Chapman

Citations

  • 103 Miss. 658
  • 60 So. 722

Syllabus

<p>Forgery. Indictment. Extrinsic facts.</p> <p>Where the effect of an instrument, alleged to be forged does not affirmatively and with sufficient clearness appear on its face, it is necessary to set forth in the indictment extraneous facts in order to invest the instrument with legal force and make it the subject of forgery.</p>

Judges: Reed

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.