State v. Chapman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• ruling that sentencing error arising from bifurcated proceeding may be redressed on remand by means of a new trial as to the sentencing phase only

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State of Missouri v. Maurice Parnell Webber
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2016-12-06· cited 12×
• State v. Rose
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2005-08-09· cited 10×
• Vanzandt v. State
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2007-01-31· cited 8×
• State v. TORELLO
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2011-03-22· cited 4×
• State v. Edwards
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2007-07-10· cited 2×
• State v. Chapman
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2007-09-18· cited 1×
• CEBRON CORDELL FINLEY, Movant-Appellant v. STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent-Respondent
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2019-12-10

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Deck v. State
  Supreme Court of Missouri· 2002-02-26· cited 260×
• State v. Cline
  Supreme Court of Missouri· 1991-05-03· cited 74×
• Reuscher v. State
  Supreme Court of Missouri· 1994-11-22· cited 66×
• State v. Thompson
  Supreme Court of Missouri· 1983-11-22· cited 36×
• State v. Jackson
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1995-04-04· cited 31×
• State v. Jaco
  Supreme Court of Missouri· 2005-03-01· cited 26×
• Shifkowski v. State
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2004-06-23· cited 20×
• State v. Griddine
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2002-02-13· cited 16×
• State v. Whardo
  Supreme Court of Missouri· 1993-08-17· cited 14×
• State v. Chapman
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1996-11-05· cited 14×
• State v. Pritchard
  Supreme Court of Missouri· 1999-01-05· cited 8×