Utah Supreme Court· 7/19/1996
State v. Chapman
Citations
- 921 P.2d 446
- 1996 WL 415634
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the officer's belief can originate either in the officer's contemporaneous observations or in the inherent nature of the underlying offense
- holding that court could not address appellant's claims because he failed to raise them in trial court below
- explaining that a suspect’s being armed on another occasion does not automatically justify a search for weapons
- defendant properly detained for loitering can be held pending check for outstanding warrants so long as length of check does not significantly extend the period of detention
- “By the officers’ own testimony, no independent facts surrounding the encounter with [the defendant] created suspicion that he was involved in any illegal activity....”
- stating unduly long detention may cast doubt upon reasonableness
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Durham, Zimmerman, Stewart, Durham'S, Russon, Howe
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
24 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. BrakeUtah Supreme Court· 2004-11-12· cited 117×
- State v. WorwoodUtah Supreme Court· 2007-06-22· cited 92×
- State v. AlverezUtah Supreme Court· 2006-10-20· cited 57×
- State v. MarklandUtah Supreme Court· 2005-04-15· cited 55×
- State v. GuardUtah Supreme Court· 2015-12-31· cited 29×
- State v. SimonsUtah Supreme Court· 2013-01-25· cited 20×
- State v. MorenoUtah Supreme Court· 2009-02-20· cited 14×
- State v. ValdezCourt of Appeals of Utah· 2003-04-03· cited 14×
- State v. RoybalUtah Supreme Court· 2010-05-14· cited 13×
- Brown v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1998-12-04· cited 10×
- State v. BakerCourt of Appeals of Utah· 2008-04-03· cited 8×
- State v. BiggsCourt of Appeals of Utah· 2007-08-02· cited 8×
- Salt Lake City v. SmootCourt of Appeals of Utah· 1996-06-20· cited 7×
- State v. MarquezCourt of Appeals of Utah· 2007-05-17· cited 6×
- State v. MitchellCourt of Appeals of Utah· 2019-11-21· cited 6×
- State v. KirkwoodCourt of Appeals of Utah· 2002-04-25· cited 5×
- State v. MartinezCourt of Appeals of Utah· 2008-03-13· cited 4×
- State v. WorwoodCourt of Appeals of Utah· 2005-12-15· cited 3×
- State v. BrakeCourt of Appeals of Utah· 2002-05-31· cited 2×
- State v. MarklandCourt of Appeals of Utah· 2004-01-02· cited 2×
Cites
22 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court· 1968-06-10· cited 37,942×
- Florida v. RoyerSupreme Court· 1983-03-23· cited 6,728×
- Delaware v. ProuseSupreme Court· 1979-03-27· cited 5,549×
- United States v. SokolowSupreme Court· 1989-04-03· cited 4,647×
- United States v. PlaceSupreme Court· 1983-06-20· cited 3,374×
- Michigan v. DeFillippoSupreme Court· 1979-06-25· cited 1,685×
- Illinois v. KrullSupreme Court· 1987-03-09· cited 1,170×
- State v. PenaUtah Supreme Court· 1994-02-15· cited 508×
- United States v. Jose Luis Guzman and Sonia Cruz-LazoTenth Circuit· 1988-12-30· cited 381×
- State v. RamirezUtah Supreme Court· 1991-04-23· cited 231×
- Hagen v. UtahSupreme Court· 1994-02-23· cited 177×
- State v. LopezUtah Supreme Court· 1994-04-25· cited 119×
- State v. MendozaUtah Supreme Court· 1987-12-01· cited 78×
- State v. JohnsonUtah Supreme Court· 1991-02-07· cited 77×
- State v. RobinsonCourt of Appeals of Utah· 1990-07-18· cited 60×
- DeBry v. NobleUtah Supreme Court· 1995-01-27· cited 58×
- Butterfield v. OkuboUtah Supreme Court· 1992-04-07· cited 55×
- State v. VincentUtah Supreme Court· 1994-10-21· cited 48×
- United States v. Frank LandryFifth Circuit· 1990-05-30· cited 47×
- State v. DeitmanUtah Supreme Court· 1987-05-28· cited 47×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.