Skip to main content

State v. Chance

Citations

  • 29 N.M. 34
  • 221 P. 183

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that an 7 indictment cannot be dismissed solely on the ground it was not supported by 8 sufficient evidence
  • in absence of statutory authority the courts are without power to look behind an indictment, duly returned into court and regular upon its face
  • in absence of statutory authority the courts are without power to look behind an indictment, duly returned into court and regular upon its face
  • “[C]ourts are 6 without power or jurisdiction to inquire into the subject and review the testimony 7 submitted to the grand jury to determine whether or not the required kind or degree 8 of evidence was submitted.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Botts, Bratton, Holloman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

24 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

25 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.