Nebraska Supreme Court· 7/3/1997
State v. Champoux
Citations
- 566 N.W.2d 763
- 252 Neb. 769
- 1997 Neb. LEXIS 160
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- upholding ordinance defining family as one or more related persons plus not more than two additional unrelated persons against state constitutional due process challenge
- noting the fact that the City of Lincoln could have chosen to effectuate its objectives in a variety of other ways does not demonstrate any constitutional defect in the zoning ordinance restricting the definition of \family\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: White, Caporale, Wright, Connolly, Gerrard, Stephan, McCormack
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
17 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Schwarz v. City of Treasure IslandEleventh Circuit· 2008-10-08· cited 258×
- Strode v. City of AshlandNebraska Supreme Court· 2016-10-28· cited 187×
- Gourley Ex Rel. Gourley v. Nebraska Methodist Health System, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court· 2003-05-16· cited 126×
- Scofield v. STATE, DNRNebraska Supreme Court· 2008-07-25· cited 96×
- Citizens of Decatur for Equal Education v. Lyons-Decatur School DistrictNebraska Supreme Court· 2007-10-05· cited 89×
- DeCoste v. City of WahooNebraska Supreme Court· 1998-08-21· cited 72×
- Staley v. City of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court· 2006-05-05· cited 49×
- State v. HiemstraNebraska Court of Appeals· 1998-05-05· cited 12×
- Village of Winslow v. SheetsNebraska Supreme Court· 2001-02-09· cited 11×
- Dirt Road Development v. HirschmanNebraska Supreme Court· 2024-05-31· cited 9×
- McMaster v. COLUMBIA BD. OF ZONING APPEALSSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2011-12-12· cited 6×
- State v. RomoNebraska Court of Appeals· 2004-03-30· cited 4×
- Dvorak v. City of BloomingtonIndiana Court of Appeals· 2002-05-17· cited 2×
- McMaster v. Columbia Board of Zoning AppealsSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2011-12-12· cited 2×
- Cox v. Douglas County Civil Service CommissionNebraska Court of Appeals· 1998-04-07· cited 1×
- S. Schwartz v. Philadelphia Zoning Board of AdjustmentCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 2015-09-24
- Opinion No. (1998)Nebraska Attorney General Reports· 1998-03-17
Cites
20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- City of Dallas v. StanglinSupreme Court· 1989-04-03· cited 583×
- Louisville Gas & Electric Co. v. ColemanSupreme Court· 1928-04-30· cited 397×
- Giger v. City of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court· 1989-06-30· cited 76×
- City of Lincoln v. ABC Books, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court· 1991-06-14· cited 70×
- Delta Charter Twp. v. DinolfoMichigan Supreme Court· 1984-07-19· cited 64×
- State v. MichalskiNebraska Supreme Court· 1985-12-06· cited 45×
- Robotham Ex Rel. Robotham v. StateNebraska Supreme Court· 1992-09-04· cited 39×
- Dinan v. Board of Zoning AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1991-08-13· cited 33×
- Kuchar v. KringsNebraska Supreme Court· 1995-12-15· cited 26×
- Borough of Glassboro v. VallorosiSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1990-01-30· cited 24×
- Village of Brady v. MelcherNebraska Supreme Court· 1993-07-09· cited 23×
- State Ex Rel. Department of Health v. JeffreyNebraska Supreme Court· 1994-12-30· cited 22×
- State v. Two IGT Video Poker GamesNebraska Supreme Court· 1991-02-01· cited 20×
- City of Brookings v. WinkerSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1996-10-30· cited 16×
- City of Ladue v. HornMissouri Court of Appeals· 1987-02-17· cited 16×
- Baer v. Town of BrookhavenNew York Court of Appeals· 1989-03-23· cited 15×
- Gas 'N Shop, Inc. v. City of KearneyNebraska Supreme Court· 1995-11-03· cited 12×
- State v. ChampouxNebraska Court of Appeals· 1996-10-15· cited 10×
- Eckstein v. City of LincolnNebraska Supreme Court· 1979-03-27· cited 7×
- Stegeman v. City of Ann ArborMichigan Court of Appeals· 1995-09-19· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.